Gears of War 4 Beta Overview and Takeaways

“Playing it safe.”

After roughly 2 weeks of activity, the Gears 4 beta concluded Sunday evening. It gave players a glimpse of what to expect this October, and aimed to sway the fans who remained skeptical of the thought of a new Gears of War.

From my time playing the beta, my overall feeling is that Gears 4 is 100% classic Gears, for better or for worse. Everything felt familiar, which is also my biggest gripe with how the game is shaping up.


To start positively, by far my favorite change in the entire game is how Gears 4 handles active reloads. By Gears 3, pre-activing (active reloading your weapon to get a damage boost before you even get in an engagement) had ruined what was such an innovative mechanic in the original Gears. One of the few good changes in Gears: Judgment was removing the damage boost altogether so players couldn’t abuse it, but it still didn’t feel quite right. Now, players can active their weapons at any time, but the active reload is a resource that needs to recharge after it’s used. This is a fantastic compromise, and maintains the significance of a perfect active reload while ensuring that it’s not abused.

As for other new additions, the Dropshot is a new explosive weapon that is a vast improvement over the Digger; whereas the Digger was slow and gave a loud audio cue to warn enemies, the Dropshot is quick and silent. It forces players to move from where they’re comfortable, and it fulfills a role that the Boomshot does not. Given that it’s so similar to the Digger, it’s not a new weapon that had me overly excited to use, but it’s a welcome addition.

The new game mode, Dodgeball, is a really smart addition to the cannon of Gears gametypes which mixes elements of Warzone with Team Deathmatch. Players have one life. If they kill an enemy, they bring back a dead teammate, and the momentum of the match shifts. It’s a fun, different mode for the series that I’m surprised hadn’t been thought of before.

The three maps, Harbour, Foundation and Dam speak to Gears 4‘s commitment to honoring the series’ past. All three were symmetrical, and within my first match, I intuitively knew exactly where each power weapon was located, what position to defend, and where to flank. For longtime fans, these maps will just make sense, and I have a feeling that most of the other maps will be consistent with this symmetrical design.

One thing that stands out about Gears 4 in comparison to the other titles is the cover movement, which is as good as it’s ever been. With each Gears installment, there are tweaks to the cover system, and Gears 4 is no exception. It’s the first Gears where when I attempted a cover maneuver, I almost always ended up exactly where I intended. However, this is one of the only aspects of the core Gears 4 gameplay that felt ostensibly new.


As for what didn’t work, the yank is a new mechanic that I was worried would break multiplayer, but it ended up being neutered to the point of hardly being useful. In order to pull it off, your target has to be in a highly specific location opposite side of the cover you’re on. If you actually manage to grab him, you can either just shoot him outright or try to go for a knife kill which can be countered by your target. So the yank is incredibly situational, and I wasn’t even able to pull it off once (although I was yanked upon).

While the yank doesn’t really hurt the game, in general Gears 4 just made me feel underwhelmed for the first time in my Gears history. When I was playing the beta, I felt like I had played what I was playing before, which is what I was ultimately most disappointed with. The first time I played Gears 2, it felt like I was playing a new and improved Gears. And when I first played the Gears 3 beta, I was blown away by how far the series had come since Gears 1. But after a few hours with Gears 4, I felt like I had my fill, and there was nothing new there that I hadn’t experienced before.

The Coalition definitely played it safe, which I understand given that Microsoft wants to revitalize the franchise. If Gears 4 would have been too off-the-wall, it would never have been accepted and the series would have died off. I get the situation the game is in, but it shouldn’t be given a free pass either.

I don’t think the graphics help the game feel any more fresh either. The Coalition’s Gears: Ultimate looked like a game that could have only been run on a current-generation system, whereas Gears 4 looks like it could run on an Xbox 360. You could say that it was only the beta and that it’ll look better in the final build, but I can’t think of any recent examples of games which significantly improved their visuals from beta to release. Graphics don’t make a game, but when your core game already feels a little stale, having it look dated doesn’t do it any favors.

That being said, I had fun on the Gears 4 beta, albeit it was the same fun I’d have if I was playing a Gears game that’s already out. I’ll probably still put a ton of time into the multiplayer, it’s just unfortunate that The Coalition stayed so conservative for the first game in this new era of Gears.


6 Maps to Cut From Call of Duty 4 Remaster

“Vote to Skip.”

Call of Duty 4, arguably the single most influential game of last generation, is getting a remaster for PlayStation 4, Xbox One and PC. It will be bundled with all special editions of the new Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare, starting at $80.

The remaster will include both the campaign and the multiplayer, and Activision says that multiplayer features like XP, Prestige and killstreaks will be brought back.

However, this is not a one-to-one recreation of the original, as there will only be 10 multiplayer maps in the remaster. The original had 16 at launch, so that means that six have to go. But in a multiplayer as iconic as COD 4, how could you stand to cut anything? Well, I bit the bullet and listed my picks for what I would choose to remove, in ascending order of reluctance.

Five of the ten (Backlot, Crash, Crossfire, Overgrown and Bog) have already been revealed, and I doubt Raven Software will include any maps from the lackluster Variety Map Pack. So these are just going to be the runts of the litter from the original 16.



I never liked Bloc. It was certainly unique, but I always felt like I could only walk around the 30% of the map that was inside of the hotel, for fear of snipers. The namesake block in the center of the map was a death trap, which I guess was the point. But still, I never felt like I had anywhere to go.

It’s awkward in Team Deathmatch, and its openness makes objective games frustrating. There’s nothing wrong with sniper maps, but compared to the maps it’s up against, Bloc is easily the weakest link.


Cod4_map_districtLike the others on this list, District is not a bad map. But it’s just not memorable. To me, District is the poor man’s Crossfire. There are some neat sections, like the market in the north, but everything that District does well, other maps do better.

It’s also not just not pretty. It’s not a visually exciting OpFor map like Showdown, and it looks drabs. As far as Middle Eastern maps go, District is pretty forgettable.


Cod4_map_vacantI like Vacant, but it’s a little out of control. There’s little cover, and I always felt like I was getting shot every which way. Almost all of the action was centralized in that main hallway, and the surrounding areas like the warehouse were practically barren.

Infinity Ward regarded it well enough to bring the map back in a Modern Warfare 2 DLC, so this map has a better chance of reappearing than the others on this list. I recognize that it’s a solid objective map, but again, there’s other maps that do it better.


Bare_Load_Screen_Downpour_CoD4Visually, Downpour is unique. The rain creates low visibility, and the tall grass and greenhouses make stealth a viable option. The vacant houses provided some memorable close-quarters encounters, and the useless mounted LMG is a classic COD 4 staple.

But in comparison to its sister map Overgrown, Overgrown just does the things that Downpour does but better. It’s a superior objective map, it’s set in the same grassy Russian farmland, and it too has a useless LMG. So given that Overgrown was announced to be included in the remaster, I think this lowers the likelihood for Downpour’s inclusion significantly.


Bare_Load_Screen_Countdown_CoD4Another sniper map, Countdown takes place during the climax of the campaign at the Russian military base. Players use long lines of site to take out enemies from across the compound, while avoiding pitfalls into cavernous missile silos. While smoke obscures the battlefield and there’s bits of cover scattered around the map, Countdown just felt like a free-for-all as far as strategy was concerned.

While not as extreme as Bloc, Countdown’s design favored players who preferred to hide on the grassy knoll and take potshots. And while that’s not a bad thing, it wasn’t always fun to run around in the center of the map, praying you didn’t get picked off.

Wet Work

Cod4_map_wetworkThis one was probably the most difficult to put on this list… The campaign level which inspires Wet Work is arguably the most iconic moment in all of the original Modern Warfare. It’s the only map where the night vision feature is potentially useful, and its symmetrical design lends itself to objective gametypes. It’s one of the most unique maps in the game, but it just doesn’t cut it.

I couldn’t put my finger on what exactly doesn’t work here, but Wet Work is one of those maps where the novelty of the setting on the cargoship is more exciting than the map itself. It’s a “line-in-the-sand” sort of map where both teams clearly control one half of the ship, and I just don’t think that works in Call of Duty’s multiplayer. It pains me to say it, but Wet Work doesn’t belong in the final remaster.


While I may have sounded overly negative, I think all of these picks are solid maps at least. However, I think in comparison to the other incredible maps in the original Modern Warfare, these ones are either too similar to superior maps or just don’t work as well as the Pipelines or the Backlots.

Truth be told, I wouldn’t be upset if any of these ended up in the remaster. It sucks that something has to be cut for this remaster, but we’re fortunate that the multiplayer is even being brought back at all. Look forward to more details about the Call of Duty 4 remake this June at E3.

Why Churches Close: The Reality of Religious Decline

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Catholics from around the Pittsburgh area came together to celebrate the final mass of St. John Vianney parish in Allentown. At the end of the emotional reunion of family, friends and classmates, presider Rev. Michael J. Stumpf invited patrons to kiss the church’s altar, as they had seen clergy do countless times before.

“You have watched priests at the beginning of mass reverence the altar by coming forward and kissing the altar. For the next 5-10 minutes or so, we’re going to invite you to do the same,” he said.

Generations of St. John Vianney members approached the altar together to say goodbye.

Fathers with sons now grown joined one another to send off the church they were raised in. Mothers and daughters helped weeping grandmothers climb the altar steps to give their lifelong parish a proper farewell.

Even the acolyte, a young girl, couldn’t hold back the tears as she watched the crowd grace her church’s altar in St. John Vianney’s final service.

This parish is another casualty in what many within the Catholic community consider to be a regression of religion. The Diocese of Pittsburgh is unable to sustain some of its older churches which are serving a dwindling number of congregants each year.

In a show of support, hundreds of people turned up to the final mass at St. John Vianney. It was standing-room-only; parish members embraced one another at the bittersweet reunion, while other attendants had come from churches around the Diocese.

“What I want to know is where were all these people when the church wasn’t closing?” one attendant commented.

The mass began with a procession led by the Knights of Columbus, followed by Rev. Stumpf, who served as the parish’s administrator.

The mass was dedicated to St. John Vianney parish, its history and those who dedicated themselves to its preservation. The Prayer of the Faithful asked for reprieve for the church’s members who felt understandably resentful.

“For those who are still conflicted after the decision to close St. John Vianney, for the healing and reconciliation of any words spoken in anger or frustration during this time of discernment for this community’s future, and for any relationships that remain broken or strained, we pray to the Lord.”

Next, a prayer was offered for the many churches who’ve been through similar situations over the past several years.

“For other parishes, schools and institutions throughout the country facing significant changes and transitions, that the love and solidarity of all Catholics may overcome all fear and sadness, we pray to the Lord.”

A few parishioners stayed behind after mass to soak in the last sights of what they’d called home for decades.

“It was a great send-off,” said Mary-Ann Taylor, who graduated from the parish’s school.

Steve Wozny, who had been a part of the church since it first opened, understood the situation despite the pain.

“It hurts, you know, but what are you gonna do?” he asked.

The building, formerly known as St. George Church, was in need of repairs, including fixing a crumbling ceiling and water damage. On top of this, the surrounding area experienced a 27 percent decrease in population, and church membership had fallen by 77 percent, according to the Diocese of Pittsburgh website.

On top of declining attendance, St. John Vianney was $3 million in debt and in need what the Diocese estimated to be more than $1 million in repairs. In August of 2015, Bishop David Zubik and former St. John Vianney pastor Rev. Thomas R. Wilson petitioned to close the parish.

A Hope for the Future

However, there is hope for the future of the church building. A number of congregants formed the St. George Preservation Society, a group dedicated to the building’s restoration. The group is named after the church’s title prior to being combined with four other parishes in 2005.

Bob Kress is the president of the Preservation Society, and was optimistic following the service.

“We’re sad the church is closing, but it’s not necessarily a closing mass,” he said.

Kress and his group are in the process of appealing Bishop David Zubick’s decision to close the church.

When a bishop decrees that a parish close, its parishioners can appeal that decision at the diocesan level. If that fails, a parish can take its case to the Congregation for the Clergy in Rome, which is the stage that the Preservation Society is at right now.

It typically takes between six to 12 months for the Congregation for the Clergy to reach a decision. If that fails, the final step is to take the case to the Apostolic Signatura, essentially the Supreme Court of the Catholic Church.

“Right now, the church doesn’t want to share ownership with us, but we’re hoping Rome tells us something different,” Kress says.

Kress and his group hope that the Diocese will outsource the care of the building to them, and are looking for monthly donations from former members to sustain the church’s operating and repair costs.

Churches in the Pittsburgh Diocese are expected to be self-sustaining, and Kress says that until just recently, St. John Vianney had been receiving nearly 4 times its operational cost from the weekly collection basket.

However, although the church can certainly survive week-to-week, the biggest obstacle for the reopening of the church is the restorative cost. The church building is in disrepair, and estimates put the price of bringing the church back to a presentable state are in the six-figure range.

“There’s about 10 years of deferred maintenance that has had a bad effect on this church,” Kress said.

Right now, Kress says the society has a five-year plan in place totaling $600,000. The group has reached out to St. George alumni across the country, hosted fundraisers and established a presence on social media to get the word out about their cause.

The Preservation Society is also hosting a GoFundMe page, which is asking for $90,000. Right now, “Save St. George Church” only has about $5,700, but Kress says the group has approximately $70,000 in pledged donations over the next several years.

“If we can get 500 people to send us $10 a week, we’re done,” said Kress.

However, even if the group reaches its goal, the reopening of the parish is not guaranteed. Having the money helps the case in the appeals process, but the Vatican can still say no.

And not every former St. John Vianney parishioner is as optimistic as Kress. Alice Frankwitt, another lifelong member of the church, feels like the fate of her parish is out of her hands.

“What can you do about it?” she said. “I don’t think it (the Preservation Society) can do any good.”

However, others at the mass, including parishioner Mary-Ann Taylor and her mother, plan on supporting the society.

“We know we could make this happen,” Kress said. “But it’s this control issue with the Diocese, and they don’t want to share responsibility with us at this point.”

Kress believes that the Preservation Society knows the building the best, and can bring the church back to its most polished and cost-efficient state.

“There’s efficiencies we can take care of when you put your mind down to it,” he said. “And we’ll deal with those efficiencies.”

“Why Close a Church?”: Making the Diocesan Decision

St. John Vianney is part of a declining trend of church involvement in the Pittsburgh area. In the late 1980s, the Diocese of Pittsburgh had 323 parishes. Since the closure of St. John Vianney, that number is down to 199.

According to John Flaherty, director of the office for pastoral research and planning at the Diocese of Pittsburgh, there are four variables which determine whether or not a parish is liable to closure.

The first is the overall number of Catholics in a given area. The second factor is the number of contributing Catholics in that location, namely the percentage of Catholics that actively participate in and help fund a parish. Third is the state of the church building, and whether restoring it would be too heavy of a burden on the collective Diocese. And finally, a general decline in the number of clergy means smaller parishes must be sacrificed to sustain the larger ones. As older priests retire, there haven’t been enough new clergymen to replace them, and so the bishop must allocate priests conservatively.

Flaherty points out that often, money isn’t the primary factor determining if a church will close or not.

“We’ve had places where money itself wasn’t the biggest problem. The biggest problem was that the congregation had shrunk so small and the bishop needed the priests to serve elsewhere,” he said. “For the bishop, it (money) isn’t the first, it’s, ‘Are the people receiving the care that they need?’ which involves the distribution of priests.”

It’s expected that every parish be financially self-sustaining, although there is a program in place where parishes that come up short can borrow money from other churches. But in terms of aid from the Diocese, it can only provide so much relief.

“The money that Bishop Zubik actually has control over is very limited,” Flaherty said. “He has very little discretionary money available to him. So even if he wanted to, he doesn’t have any resources to provide funds to parishes. So they have to be self-sustaining, and if they’re not self-sustaining, that’s when something has to change.”

To combat this decline, last April Zubik launched, “On Mission for the Church Alive!”. The program’s purpose is, “to foster viable, sustainable, and vibrant parishes and schools that support the mission of Jesus Christ and His Church,” according to its website. The organization studies this precipitous decline in American religious worship, and looks to inspire others to become clergy, stating that at this rate, in five years the Diocese of Pittsburgh will have more churches than priests.

Apart from financial constraints and a lack of clergy, Flaherty believes these problems are symptoms of a larger disease.

“The bigger issue is that people have lost a sense of their commitment to and practice of the faith. And that’s why Bishop has been very clear that On Mission is not nearly as much about restructuring, and that it’s ultimately about reinvigorating the church’s activities,” he said.

“You could say that things aren’t working financially, and that’s true, but you’d also say that things aren’t working religiously, so we as the church aren’t doing something right when it comes to passing on the faith.

There is precedence for this kind of massive reevaluation within the Diocese. During his time as bishop of the Diocese of Pittsburgh, Cardinal Donald Wuerl launched what was called the, “Parish Reorganization and Revitalization Project” which either consolidated or closed 155 parishes from 1994-1996. Two-thirds of all church suppressions in the Diocese’s history occurred during those three years.

According to Flaherty, Pittsburgh’s socioeconomic situation at that time was not dissimilar from the one it’s currently in.

“The Diocese of Pittsburgh had come out of the 70’s and 80’s and faced the dramatic changes and economic realities of Southwestern Pennsylvania,” he said.

The Diocese found itself with more parishes than it needed, and so several churches were combined into one. Prior to Wuerl’s restructuring, South Side contained seven churches which served 24,000 people. By 1990, that number dropped to 6,000, and those seven parishes were combined into one: Prince of Peace church.

This same phenomenon also saw the effective end of ethnic parishes. In the early 1990s, one-third of Pittsburgh parishes were still considered to be ethnic. But as more young people left the area to find jobs, Polish, Italian and Slovakian churches began to fade.

“As that ethnic identity began to weaken over time as neighborhoods changed and people moved away, there was no longer a reason to continue that ethnic parish,” Flaherty said. “And that’s a case where money isn’t always the issue. In many cases, many of those ethnic parishes were very financially solvent. The issue was there just weren’t any people.”

However, Flaherty is optimistic and emphasizes that when churches close, multiple churches are being consolidated to create a brand new one. On top of that, entirely new churches are being built in Franklin Township and Richland Township, due to their population growth.

Even still, he maintains that Zubik’s revitalization of the Church in Pittsburgh is a systemic overhaul, and will go further than just the construction and destruction of churches.

“We need to look at how we’re carrying out our mission, even beyond the buildings in which we pray and teach. And that’s really the bigger challenge the bishop has called us to. And as you can imagine, it’s a much longer-term activity than just closing parishes and closing church buildings.”

Catholic Priest Champions Conservative Values

Under the leadership of the progressive Pope Francis, the Roman Catholic Church is undoubtedly in an era of change. But despite 90 percent of Catholics viewing the head of the church favorably according to Pew Research, a vocal minority of traditionalists believe Francis is leading the church astray from its roots.

The Rev. Ladis Cizik is one such priest who regularly speaks out against what he calls the “identity crisis” happening within the Catholic Church. Serving in residence at Our Lady of Joy Parish in Plum Borough, Cizik is known for fundamentalist views.

Jim Jiuji, a member of Our Lady of Joy for almost 30 years, is familiar with Cizik’s conservative sermons.

With a laugh, Jiuji says, “He’s really devoted. Deeply devoted.”

Despite what others think, preaching and “standing up for the truth” is what Cizik loves about being a priest.

“I’m not trying to win a popularity contest,” Cizik said. “I’m trying to save souls.”

Cizik is passionate about his faith, and says he always felt a calling from God to enter the priesthood. As a child, he would play pretend-priest with his friends.

“My mother had an old drape that I used as a chasuble, and I had my buddies that served as my altar boys,” Cizik said. “When I distributed communion I would have Necco Wafers for them.”

After graduating college from Duquesne University as an accounting major, he worked for five years at the accounting firm Price Waterhouse. He was successful and enjoyed his job, and remained a devout Catholic.

“My Catholic faith was always strong,” Cizik said. “When I was on the road I made sure to get to mass every Sunday. I took other accountants with me to church on holy days and reminded them, ‘We’re Catholics, we should be in church.’”

But despite his accomplishments, Cizik still felt “a calling from God” to become a priest, and ultimately left his job.

After joining the priesthood in 1987, he embarked on a number of pilgrimages including missions to Fátima, Portugal; Rome and San Giovanni Rotondo.

After almost 30 years in the priesthood, Cizik has seen how the various changes in how mass is practiced have affected the Catholic Church. He says that after the Second Vatican Council, the general focus of worship has shifted.

“Prior to Vatican II, we were a God-centered church. And then after Vatican II, we became a man-centered church in many ways,” he said.

For example, Cizik says that changes like putting the tabernacle to the side of the altar instead of at the center or having the priest face the people during mass instead of the Eastern horizon send a message that people are the primary focus of worship, not God.

“The sign of peace is another thing that bothers me,” he said. “Right after the consecration, the priest says, ‘Let us offer one another the sign of peace,’ and he begins shaking people’s hands, and pandemonium erupts in the church. And so the focus is off the consecrated blood of the Lord, and the people are led by the presider to focus on one another and not on the Lord. And that’s not right.”

Cizik believes these seemingly subtle changes have significant implications on how worshipers view their faith. He’s a firm believer in the Latin phrase, ‘Lex orandi, lex credenda,’ which means, ‘How you worship is how you believe.”

It’s because of this that he disagrees with the inclusive stances that Pope Francis has recently taken. Cizik says the pope has made some “questionable” comments, and that he’s religiously indifferent in his teachings.

“Why would you want to become Catholic if the Pope says, ‘We don’t want you, just stay where you are?’” Cizik said.

He also says that the Catholic Church’s mission is no longer to convert others, but to perform community service. This is contrary to the church’s primary directive for the past 2,000 years, which was to spread the message of Catholicism.

“We want to, out of love, convert these people to Catholicism. So when you tell them it doesn’t matter what religion they are, that’s a disgrace,” he said.

As for Pope Francis’ fans, Cizik says they don’t truly understand the Catholic faith.

“People who generally have no love for the Catholic Church love Pope Francis,” Cizik said. “It’s nominal Catholics, non-practicing Catholics, non-Catholics, because he doesn’t offend them.

“There are people who know what the Catholic Church taught before Vatican II, and they’re saying, ‘What he’s saying is not consistent with that teaching,’ and so they don’t care for him. The Catholic Church should be unchanging… Those who understand our faith will question many of the things he says and be disturbed by them.”

Cizik believes to attract the dwindling number of congregants, the church needs a solid foundation instead of a fluid, liberal doctrine. He recalls a proverb that nuns had taught him as a kid:

“’The Catholic faith is a sure rock that you can tie your boat to; a rock that keeps shifting and moving is not what you want to tie your boat to,’” Cizik said. “People are looking for a rock. They’re looking for a place to tie their boat to. It’s turbulent seas right now; things are always changing and on the move, and not consistent with what we believed before, and that does not make for a healthy church.”

As for the future of the church, Cizik is optimistic. But he believes it’s necessary to return to traditional roots and values.

“(Things) are probably going to get worse before they get better…We always have to keep our focus on God, not on man,” he said.

“We’re not out to win popularity contests. We’re out to win souls for Christ. That’s what everyone should be concerned about, from everyone from the pope down to the person in the pew. It doesn’t matter what people think about us, only what God thinks about us.”